Arq backup gives you a lot of options on where and how to do your backup, but it now seems like Google has the upper hand.Īnd for those who think that Google already has enough of your information, I’m happy to inform you that you can encrypt your backup with a password, so no one except you can get to the information. First impression after creating the account and choosing the location for my backup? Faster upload than Amazon Glacier. So now I’m moving my backup over to Google Nearline Storage. Otherwise, if you want to only pay for what you use, Google Cloud Storage Nearline seems just about perfect. If you’re already paying for a Dropbox or Google Drive account with lots of storage, Arq can back up to that storage. When storage providers compete, Arq users win! The Nearline pricing is much easier to understand in general than Glacier’s confusing fees. There’s no 4-hour delay, and Google doesn’t incur any crazy “peak hourly request” fees if you restore too quickly. Google Cloud Storage Nearline is a great option for backups because it’s only $.01/GB per month for storage cost, and it’s much, much easier to restore your files from Google Nearline than from Amazon Glacier. Google just announced a new storage service that’s better than Glacier! The people at Haystack software, the makers of Arq just sent out an email. Enter Arq backup with Google Cloud Storage Nearline Add that to the fact that you have to be a rocket scientist to actually calculate how much it will cost, makes it even more annoying. And it can get crazy expensive if you’re in a hurry.
#ARQ BACKUP DOWNLOAD#
If you need to restore your data, there is an initial waiting period and the faster you download your data, the more expensive it gets. So I’ve been quite happy with the solution. But that’s a one time cost and it doesn’t cost an arm and a leg. It’s cheap, with about $0.01 per Gb per month to store your information in the cloud, and an additional transfer cost for uploading all the images. Up till now, I’ve been using Amazon Glacier to store all my images. So I also do an off-site backup using the excellent Arq backup program. A fire, burglary or simple hardware failure makes me uneasy. But I don’t want to rely on a single backup. So I use rsync to make a backup to my NAS which uses RAID–1 for extra protection. But my photo library in Adobe Lightroom is too big to fit on the SSD drive used in my MacBook Pro, and TimeMachine doesn’t do a backup of external drives. I am sure that they are proprietary and that BackBlaze uses their own proprietary storage method. I the 15 months Ive been using this solution. The B2 repositories created and used by ARQ are formatted and look just like Arq uses for a local backup. We went with the Arq7 app to do nightly backups to another 8TB drive and backups to the cloud three times a week.
#ARQ BACKUP MAC#
I usually do my regular backup using TimeMachine on my Mac to an Apple Time Capsule. Arq’s backup I am sure is completely different from BackBlaze. I have seen customers of mine that have lost all their images due to a hard disk crashing and seen the tears. There’s one thing that I fear when it comes to my storage and that is to lose all the pictures I’ve been taking for all these years.
0 kommentar(er)
